http://neelu.blogr.com/metaTags/642-892/ XML Feed en Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:20:16 +0200 http://static.blogr.com/tenants/com/modSiteIcon/tdy-dummy-site-icon.icon.jpg http://neelu.blogr.com/metaTags/642-892/ 48 48 http://neelu.blogr.com/stories/8192727/ If, as Jimbo's comments regarding the block suggests, custodians privately asked him to make the block, rather than do it themselves, it does not bode well for the health of this project, IMO. I find it very troubling that no-one who asked for the block privately has disclosed that information. Is the only way to deal with disputes here to go behind others' backs? I consider Jimbo's <a href="http://www.certifyme.com/642-642.htm">642-642 Exam</a> threat to ban me for reverting Centaur of Attention (almost a month earlier) to be way out of line as well. I'm not alone in regarding Centaur's edits as bordering on vandalism as well as attempting to impose a BADSITES-style policy on this site, and I'm extremely disappointed that Jimbo is backing his side against mine. I agree that it would have been better if a block request could have been made more transparently. It is possible that Moulton's &quot;chummy&quot; nature with JWSchmidt intimidated some users, as JWSchmidt seems to <a href="http://www.certifyme.com/642-825.htm">642-825 Exam</a> fully support what Moulton is doing, and JWSchmidt is a custodian. I have considered that it may relate to JWSchmidt's behavior, in which case the blame would partly lie with him for his part in developing the atmosphere. However, if fear of crossing one person is derailing things that badly, then it just underscores that there's a greater problem. Is there a process for addressing off-course projects and concerns about editors before it comes to deleting/blocking? I couldn't find one, so I would think it probably needs to be developed or better articulated. To diffuse this from getting out of hand above, I would like to state that I support the block, and that my only concern <a href="http://www.certifyme.com/642-892.htm">642-892 Exam</a> was timing. Although I was not consulted by Jimbo, I would have wholeheartedly agreed with the action at this time. I don't mean to be too confrontational. I'm not poking at things in order to agitate (though I know that can happen), but because I perceive something is wrong here, and I would like to narrow down what it is. http://neelu.blogr.com/stories/8192727/ Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:20:16 +0200 neelu